The growing stream of reporting on and data about fake news, misinformation, partisan content, and news literacy is hard to keep up with. This weekly roundup
offers the highlights of what you might have missed.
It’s fun to hate on Facebook, but credit where credit’s due: The platform’s attempts to get fake news and misinformation out of people’s feeds seem to be working, according to a new working paper from NYU’s Hunt Allcott and Stanford’s Matthew Gentzkow and Chuan Yu. Looking at the spread of stories from 570 fake news sites (the list, here, includes sites that publish 100 percent fake news and sites that publish some pure fake news along with other highly partisan/misleading stories), and using BuzzSumo to track monthly interactions (shares/comments/reactions/likes/tweets), they find that “the overall magnitude of the misinformation problem may have declined, at
Continue reading "Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)"
When Facebook announced its pivot to Groups in the algorithm, publishers obediently pivoted as well.
Some were already there — nurturing communities around a common thread, an event, or a locality, or gathering subscribers/fans in one centralized place. Some, honestly, seem plain thirsty for the eyeballs heading to their site content. That’d been part of Facebook’s olive branch (bait carrot?) to the news industry, though Campbell Brown’s recent comments
drove that stake into the heart of the traffic promise that the Page → Group algorithm preference
had already wedged in.
But hey, maybe these groups could be a new opportunity for news organizations to circle up with those meaningful interactions.
“I do worry this news is going to make ‘pivot to groups’ the new ‘pivot to video,’” one engagement editor at a U.S. publisher told us
when we reached out to dozens of audience development and social media Continue reading "Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring"
It’s fun to hate on newspapers’ op-ed sections (inspiring debate is kind of the point), meaning the job of editing them is not for the faint-hearted. And changing and diversifying them can be a challenge — whether you’re battling bad-faith arguments from the alt-right
or just trying to get rid of a strain of [deep, booming, obviously male voice] “I want to tell you about Middle East policy.”
The deep, booming “I want to tell you about Middle East policy” had been the problem with the Financial Times’ opinion section, but Brooke Masters
is up to the challenge of fixing it. At the FT for more than a decade, she was the companies editor before becoming opinion and analysis editor this past spring. Her role — diversifying the 130-year-old paper’s opinion section, previously known as “Comment” and dominated by opining men — is just a piece of what the Continue reading "Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section"
I’m pretty sure I purchased Civil
tokens yesterday — literally buying into an experiment to strengthen journalism by putting some of it on the blockchain.
After passing two tests, uploading my passport and driver’s license to unfamiliar websites, and plunking down a large (for me) sum for a cryptocurrency, I was cleared for token takeoff. When the sale began at 10 a.m.
, I indicated how many Civil tokens I wanted and sent off that valuable cryptocurrency to pay for them.
And I got nothing.
No tokens appeared in my digital wallet. No comforting “your tokens are being shipped” email. Not even a “Share your purchase with a friend!” button. The “purchased” area in my account was blank.
But I’m actually at peace with that. I think it’s going to work out, and I’m into this journey.
Earlier this year, my friends Manoush Zomorodi
Continue reading "How to buy into journalism’s blockchain future (in only 44 steps)"
A comprehensive list of 45 affordable summer camps
isn’t a typical item on Billy Penn’s website. (More standard: “Center City has fewer restaurants with sidewalk cafes but more outdoor seating overall”
or “City Council pronunciation guide: How to say your elected officials’ names.”
But then again, 19 news organizations actually working together to pool their reporting on economic inequality isn’t your everyday local news market, either.
“As journalists, we’re taught to be competitive and territorial. On the other hand, things are changing dramatically, so don’t assume other people in your local market don’t want to collaborate,” Jean Friedman-Rudovsky
, the collaboration’s editor, said. “If you’re thinking about it, chances are they’re thinking about it too.”
, one of the three Spirited Media sites
aimed at those pesky millennials in various local areas, had joined the Inquirer/Daily News/Philly.com, WHYY, and a dozen other Philadelphia-based news Continue reading "How the Broke in Philly collaboration is focusing local media’s attention on poverty and economic mobility"
If France could stop misinformation, could the U.S.?
A newly-translated-to-English report
reflects on how the country handled misinformation and politically motivated document leaks in its 2017 presidential election and offers 50 recommendations for how gouvernements, société civile et acteurs privés
could tackle similar problems. The findings are compiled in a hefty 200 pages from a working group between France’s foreign affairs minister’s policy planning staff and France’s research institute of the Ministry for the Armed Forces.
The group originally convened to explore developing an inter-agency task force dealing with information manipulation, their preferred term for fake news
, defined as “the intentional and massive dissemination of false or biased news for hostile political purposes.” (Need a reminder for why it might be hazardous to our health to use that phrase? Here you go
.) This report comes from the researchers’ approximately 100 interviews with national authorities, academics, and Continue reading "How France beat back information manipulation (and how other democracies might do the same)"
Last week, The Guardian announced
it was joining the cluster of publications currently developing a flagship daily news and current affairs podcast. It will be hosted by Anushka Asthana
, a former senior political correspondent on TV for Sky News and The Guardian’s current political editor. (Asthana is actually one half of a job share
for the role with colleague Heather Stewart, which was a groundbreaking arrangement for Westminster political reporting when it began in 2016).
The daily news podcast is scheduled to launch before the end of the year, and it will be monetised by Acast, which had previously worked with The Guardian on the latter’s Football Weekly and Politics Weekly shows. Bose will serve as its first sponsor, and I’m told that the launch sponsorship slots for the show in the U.K. have already been sold out.
Leo Hornak, formerly of the BBC (and who you might Continue reading "The Guardian is getting into the daily news podcast game — here’s what it learned the last time it tried"